In National Union of Rail, Maritime and Transport Workers v Tyne and Wear Passenger Transport Executive T/A Nexus [2024] UKSC 37, the Supreme Court has handed down an important judgment on the scope of rectification, holding that a collective bargaining agreement can be rectified even though it is not a legally enforceable contract. Of greater relevance for pensions lawyers is the decision that the Employment Tribunal, whilst it does not have the power to make a rectification order, can nevertheless treat a document as having been rectified on the basis of the principle that "equity can treat as done that which ought to have been done". This has potentially wide-ranging consequences for other statutory tribunals, including the FTT and the Pensions Ombudsman.
An article on this case will appear on the website shortly. In the meantime, the judgment can be read here.
Comments